Deep Dive
The Energy Myth Gets Numbers
Christophe starts from a personal question: does using ChatGPT carry hidden environmental costs worth worrying about? He discovers companies have been secretive about energy consumption, but finds a leaderboard run by researcher Jaywan Chung at the University of Michigan. When Christophe asks Chung for an average energy cost, Chung hedges—there's a 100x difference between the most and least efficient queries depending on model size, hardware, and request length. Then in summer 2025, the companies actually disclosed numbers. OpenAI's Sam Altman claimed ChatGPT averages 0.34 watt-hours per query. Google estimated Gemini at 0.24 watt-hours. Averaging to roughly 0.3 watt-hours, Christophe puts this in perspective: it's like running a 60-watt light bulb for 18 seconds, brewing coffee for 10 seconds, or using a microwave for 1 second.
The Image and Video Problem
While text queries are cheap, generating images jumps to about 3 watt-hours—10 times more, equivalent to a light bulb for 3 minutes. Video generation is far worse at 90 watt-hours, roughly an hour and a half of light bulb use. These numbers matter because platforms are aggressively pushing image and video generation everywhere. Christophe also learns that the 0.3 figure only counts answering prompts. Training AI models takes energy too. Google's research shows 60% of AI energy goes to answering queries and 40% to training, so the true per-prompt cost is closer to 0.5 watt-hours. Still, expert Andy Masley puts individual usage in context: one prompt equals about one-150,000th of your daily carbon emissions. Switching a single burger to plant-based or driving slightly less saves thousands of times more emissions than skipping a chatbot query.
Data Centers Are the Real Story
Even if individual prompts are tiny, the technology's total footprint is massive. Data centers made up over 4% of US electricity consumption in 2024, with projections reaching 12% by 2028. Christophe discovers over 4,000 data centers across America on datacentermap.com. Zooming into Richland Parish, Louisiana on Google Earth, he sees Meta building a facility that would cover a huge chunk of Manhattan and consume as much electricity as 2 million households. The problem: most data center power still comes from fossil fuels, making their electricity 48% more carbon-intensive than the national average. Tech companies are investing in nuclear and renewable energy to eventually reduce per-prompt emissions, but for now, communities hosting these data centers live with the consequences.
Infrastructure Costs and Bill Shock
Residents near data centers worry about their electricity bills rising. Christophe learns from Ari Pesco at Harvard Law School and Michael Thomas from Clean View that data centers are indeed driving increases—but not because they directly consume so much power. The real culprit is the utility business model. Utilities profit by building infrastructure like power lines and poles. When a data center arrives demanding a gigawatt of power, utilities happily build new transmission infrastructure and spread the cost across all customers in their service area, even those nowhere near the data center. This means electricity bills climb for regular people subsidizing infrastructure they didn't request or benefit from. Utilities have no financial incentive to refuse: they literally make money by building stuff. Data centers are now the perfect excuse to construct massive new infrastructure and charge customers for it.
The Invisible Redistribution
Christophe concludes that individual AI use is not worth stressing over—text queries are negligible, though image and video generation deserve more thought. But the broader story reveals an unfair system. AI training and operation is becoming a sizable chunk of total energy consumption. The consequences aren't evenly distributed. They land hardest on communities hosting data centers, not because those facilities demand extraordinary electricity, but because utilities use them as justification to build expensive new infrastructure and pass costs to ordinary people through higher bills. Those costs may start small and remain invisible to most users, but the technology is radically reshaping infrastructure around us. Someone is already footing the bill, and it's not the tech companies reaping the rewards.