What's Going on with Windows Laptops?

17 min video5 key momentsWatch original

⚡

TL;DR

Windows laptops can't compete with MacBooks at any price point because Apple's vertical integration lets them make better hardware for less money, while Windows manufacturers depend on multiple vendors all taking cuts.

Key Insights

ecosystem lock-in as profit engine — Apple doesn't need to profit much on MacBook Neo hardware because the real money is locking people into services, apps, and ecosystem lock-in. It's a Trojan horse strategy identical to Google's Chromebook play.

bloatware necessity and execution risk — Windows laptop makers have to put bloatware on machines just to make them cheap enough to compete. Dell relies on Intel executing well, Windows being stable, and their own quality execution all at once. One failure tanks the whole product.

Microsoft's conflicted position — Microsoft tried vertical integration with Surface but treats it as an afterthought because they're fundamentally a B2B company. Now they're competing against their own OEM partners while also selling them Windows.

M5 Max desktop-class specs — The M5 Max MacBook Pro's SSD speeds hit 18,000 MB/s, multi-core scores beat Mac Pro and M3 Ultra, and GPU scores match M3 Ultra. That's desktop-class performance in a laptop because of tight hardware integration.

Windows 11 setup experience — Windows 11 setup is a nightmare. 45 minutes of mandatory updates, constant sign-in prompts, AI features getting pushed, and McAfee popups. Even after a clean install you're fighting bloatware and bad UX.

manufacturers won't compete directly — Windows manufacturers are so intimidated by Apple's dominance that when Dave2D asked them for laptops at the same price as the M1 Air five years ago, they sent them. Now he asks again and they refuse because they know they'll lose that comparison.

Deep Dive

The MacBook advantage: vertical integration prints money

The M5 Max MacBook Pro pulled 18,000 MB/s SSD speeds and benchmarked higher in multi-core performance than any Mac ever made, including the Mac Pro and M3 Ultra. It has GPU scores matching the Ultra chip. This is possible because Apple controls the entire stack: chips, software, hardware design. On the flip side, a $550 Acer Windows laptop can't touch MacBook performance at the same price. Apple then leverages this hardware advantage to sell services. Neo, the budget MacBook at $499-599, doesn't need to be profitable on hardware margins because Apple's making serious money on AppleCare, Apple TV, Creative Studio, and services. It's a Trojan horse to create lifelong customers. Google uses the same strategy with Chromebooks getting kids on Google services early.

Windows is fighting itself: too many cooks, no kitchen

Every Windows laptop requires execution from multiple vendors. Dell designs the XPS well, but they're dependent on Intel making a good chip at that moment, Windows 11 being solid, and their own keyboard and screen being high quality. If any link breaks, the product fails. Compare that to Apple owning the whole chain. Windows manufacturers also can't compete on price without bloatware deals. Dell puts Instagram and Facebook on laptops because Meta pays them to. That's the only way Windows makers undercut Apple's margins. Microsoft tried vertical integration with Surface but doesn't really care. They're a B2B company first. Now they're simultaneously selling Windows to every OEM while competing against those same companies with their own hardware. It's a structural conflict that never resolved.

Windows 11 is a UX disaster

Setting up a new XPS took 45 minutes of forced updates, repeated sign-in screens, and aggressive prompts for Copilot, Recall, and other features. After finally reaching a clean install, McAfee popup. The operating system is fighting the user constantly. Windows 10 didn't do this. Waveform Clips noted that while they're fine with Windows functionally, the onboarding experience is sufferable and the bloatware problem is structural to how Windows makers make economics work.

Real-world Windows pain: USB ports that don't work

The crew tested a Windows PC with strong specs on paper but ran into bizarre issues. A USB 3.0 peripheral kept crashing. Theory: the USB 3.0 ports aren't actually USB 3.0 ports. When they tried the USB 3.2 port instead, it worked. No Bluetooth keyboard would connect except one Logitech that lasted 30 seconds. This is the integration problem in action. The motherboard USB components came from a third-party supplier. Dell didn't build the ports themselves. Quality control breaks down across vendor boundaries in ways that don't happen when one company controls everything.

The switching problem is real

One reviewer moved from Android to iPhone specifically because everyone in the Bay Area used iMessage group chats. Green bubble bullying is actually how ecosystems trap users. David Pierce tested Android for four months, loved the Fairphone 6, but couldn't use it on Verizon and switched back to iOS because iOS has better apps. Android is arguably the better OS but iOS has the better app ecosystem. Same trap works on laptops. The MacBook Neo isn't being bought because it's objectively better at raw specs. It's bought because it gets someone onto Final Cut Pro, iCloud, Messages, and suddenly they're locked in a decade later.

Takeaways

✓Apple's vertical integration means they can undercut Windows competitors on price while delivering better performance. Windows makers can't replicate this without owning the entire supply chain.
✓Windows 11 bloatware and aggressive onboarding aren't bugs, they're features. Manufacturers need those revenue deals to stay competitive with Apple's margins.
✓If you're testing a new Windows laptop with quality issues, the problem likely lives at the intersection of multiple vendors where no one is accountable.
✓Don't underestimate ecosystem lock-in as Apple's real profit driver. MacBook Neo doesn't have to make money on hardware because Apple will make it back ten times over on services and ecosystem products.

Key moments

2:00M5 Max dominates benchmarks

“It had like 18,000 megabyte per second SSD read and write speeds, which is crazy. It has benchmarked multi-core higher than any other Mac ever, including the Mac Pro and M3 Ultra. It has GPU scores matching M3 Ultra, which is insane.”

4:00The MacBook Neo lock-in strategy

“Apple doesn't actually really need to make a ton of money on Neo's on the hardware margin services because it is basically as I said in the video like a Trojan horse for new Apple customers which then will spend way more on software on services on Apple Care on Apple TV on Apple Creative Studio all these other things.”

10:00Windows 11 setup nightmare

“It took me 45 minutes to set it up. The setup is sufferable. There were mandatory downloading updates and stuff. Once I got through the updates, it was like sign into this, sign into that, download Microsoft 365, do you want to use C-Pilot? Do you want recall on?”

15:00Manufacturers refuse direct comparison

“Dave 2D put out a really good video recently about this and the kind of the gist of this was that a number of years ago, like five or six years ago, he had all of the Windows manufacturers send him laptops that were in the same price range as the Apple M1 Air. And then he asked all the same manufacturers this year to send him laptops that were in the same price range. And they were all like, 'No.'”

17:30Ecosystem lock-in wins everything

“That's the point of Neo. That's the point of like all these other you know feelers is to just get a device in front of you that gives you options and hopefully you like one of those things and then you are sucked into that ecosystem.”

Get AI-powered video digests

Follow your favorite creators and get concise summaries delivered to your dashboard. Save hours every week.

Start for free